Part of PICRYL.com. Not developed or endorsed by the Library of Congress

requisition

public
92 media by topicpage 1 of 1
Reservists and wagons under requisition -- Latour Maubourg

Reservists and wagons under requisition -- Latour Maubourg

Photograph shows reservists and wagons being requisitioned probably on Boulevard de la Tour-Maubourg, Paris, France. (Source: Flickr Commons project, 2011)

French requisition iron pipe in Ruhr

French requisition iron pipe in Ruhr

Public domain historical photo, free to use, no copyright restrictions image - Picryl description

An abstract of the returns made by the commissioners of the City of Philadelphia and the several counties of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, in pursuance of a requisition of the Committee of ways and means of the House of representatives of th

An abstract of the returns made by the commissioners of the City of Ph...

Imprint 3.; E, 2318, 250 Available also through the Library of Congress web site in two forms: as facsimile page images and as full text in SGML. 2 duplicate copies Printed Ephemera Collection; Portfolio 151, F... More

State of North Carolina. A proclamation, by John W. Ellis. Governor of North Carolina Whereas: By proclamation of Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States, followed by a requisition of Simon Cameron, Secretary of War, I am informed that t

State of North Carolina. A proclamation, by John W. Ellis. Governor of...

Proclamation. Available also through the Library of Congress web site in two forms: as facsimile page images and as full text in SGML. Printed Ephemera Collection; Portfolio 135, Folder 12.

Requisition for straw, cor Capt. company of Virginia militia, from the regiment, in the county of, called into actual service under the general orders of the day of 181. now at [181-].

Requisition for straw, cor Capt. company of Virginia militia, from the...

Public domain scan of the book page, free to use, no copyright restrictions image - Picryl description

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisition of the government of Ohio, on charge of kidnapping Jerry Phinney, and tried before the Franklin Circuit Court of Kentucky, April 10, 1846.

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisiti...

Also available in digital form on the Library of Congress Web site.

By the United States in Congress assembled, Wednesday, August 20, 1788 : The committee, consisting of Mr. Clark, Mr. Dane, Mr. Williamson, Mr. Bingham, and Mr. Baldwin, to whom was referred the report of the Board of Treasury respecting a requisition for the year 1788, having reported ...

By the United States in Congress assembled, Wednesday, August 20, 1788...

Imprint from Evans. Former attribution to John Dunlap rejected in the Journals of the Continental Congress, v. 34, p. 631. Recorded in Dunlap's account book. Cf. JCC 611. Evans 21516 Journals of the Continental... More

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisition of the government of Ohio, on charge of kidnapping Jerry Phinney, and tried before the Franklin Circuit Court of Kentucky, April 10, 1846.

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisiti...

Also available in digital form on the Library of Congress Web site.

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisition of the government of Ohio, on charge of kidnapping Jerry Phinney, and tried before the Franklin Circuit Court of Kentucky, April 10, 1846.

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisiti...

Also available in digital form on the Library of Congress Web site.

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisition of the government of Ohio, on charge of kidnapping Jerry Phinney, and tried before the Franklin Circuit Court of Kentucky, April 10, 1846.

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisiti...

Also available in digital form on the Library of Congress Web site.

The committee, consisting of [blank] to whom wasreferred [sic] the report of the Board of Treasury respecting a requisition for the year 1788, report ...

The committee, consisting of [blank] to whom wasreferred [sic] the rep...

Imprint from Evans. Former attribution to John Dunlap rejected in the Journals of the Continental Congress, v. 34, p. 631. Recorded in Dunlap's account book. Cf. JCC 610. Evans 21519 Journals of the Continental... More

The committee, consisting of [blank] to whom wasreferred [sic] the report of the Board of Treasury respecting a requisition for the year 1788, report ...

The committee, consisting of [blank] to whom wasreferred [sic] the rep...

Imprint from Evans. Former attribution to John Dunlap rejected in the Journals of the Continental Congress, v. 34, p. 631. Recorded in Dunlap's account book. Cf. JCC 610. Evans 21519 Journals of the Continental... More

To the inhabitants of Pennsylvania. In Council of Safety. Lancaster, 23, October, 1777 Friends and countrymen. We are again called upon by General Washington, for a reinforcement of the militia and have complied with his requisition, on our part
Thomas Jefferson, January 1, 1784, Requisition for State Payments of United States Public Debt

Thomas Jefferson, January 1, 1784, Requisition for State Payments of U...

Requisition for State Payments of United States Public Debt

The grand committee consisting of Mr. Howell, Mr. Foster, Mr. King, Mr. Cook, Mr. Platt, Mr. Cadwallader, Mr. Henry, Mr. Bedford, Mr. M'Henry, Mr. Hardy, Mr. Williamson, Mr. Pinckney and Mr. Houstoun, appointed to report a requisition on the states for the supplies of the present year, beg leaveto [sic] lay before Congress, the following report.

The grand committee consisting of Mr. Howell, Mr. Foster, Mr. King, Mr...

Public domain scan of the book page, free to use, no copyright restrictions image - Picryl description

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisition of the government of Ohio, on charge of kidnapping Jerry Phinney, and tried before the Franklin Circuit Court of Kentucky, April 10, 1846.

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisiti...

Also available in digital form on the Library of Congress Web site.

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisition of the government of Ohio, on charge of kidnapping Jerry Phinney, and tried before the Franklin Circuit Court of Kentucky, April 10, 1846.

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisiti...

Also available in digital form on the Library of Congress Web site.

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisition of the government of Ohio, on charge of kidnapping Jerry Phinney, and tried before the Franklin Circuit Court of Kentucky, April 10, 1846.

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisiti...

Also available in digital form on the Library of Congress Web site.

The grand committee consisting of Mr. Howell, Mr. Foster, Mr. King, Mr. Cook, Mr. Platt, Mr. Cadwallader, Mr. Henry, Mr. Bedford, Mr. M'Henry, Mr. Hardy, Mr. Williamson, Mr. Pinckney and Mr. Houstoun, appointed to report a requisition on the states for the supplies of the present year, beg leaveto [sic] lay before Congress, the following report.

The grand committee consisting of Mr. Howell, Mr. Foster, Mr. King, Mr...

Public domain scan of the book page, free to use, no copyright restrictions image - Picryl description

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisition of the government of Ohio, on charge of kidnapping Jerry Phinney, and tried before the Franklin Circuit Court of Kentucky, April 10, 1846.

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisiti...

Also available in digital form on the Library of Congress Web site.

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisition of the government of Ohio, on charge of kidnapping Jerry Phinney, and tried before the Franklin Circuit Court of Kentucky, April 10, 1846.

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisiti...

Also available in digital form on the Library of Congress Web site.

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisition of the government of Ohio, on charge of kidnapping Jerry Phinney, and tried before the Franklin Circuit Court of Kentucky, April 10, 1846.

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisiti...

Also available in digital form on the Library of Congress Web site.

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisition of the government of Ohio, on charge of kidnapping Jerry Phinney, and tried before the Franklin Circuit Court of Kentucky, April 10, 1846.

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisiti...

Also available in digital form on the Library of Congress Web site.

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisition of the government of Ohio, on charge of kidnapping Jerry Phinney, and tried before the Franklin Circuit Court of Kentucky, April 10, 1846.

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisiti...

Also available in digital form on the Library of Congress Web site.

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisition of the government of Ohio, on charge of kidnapping Jerry Phinney, and tried before the Franklin Circuit Court of Kentucky, April 10, 1846.

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisiti...

Also available in digital form on the Library of Congress Web site.

At a General Assembly of the Governor and company of the State of Connecticut, holden at Hartford, on the second Thursday of May, 1780. Whereas a requisition has been made on this State by the Honorable Commitee of Congress, and by his excellenc

At a General Assembly of the Governor and company of the State of Conn...

Imprint 3. Available also through the Library of Congress web site in two forms: as facsimile page images and as full text in SGML. 2 duplicate copies Printed Ephemera Collection; Portfolio 3, Folder 53. Copy scanned: 2

To the inhabitants of Pennsylvania. In Council of Safety. Lancaster, 23, October, 1777 Friends and countrymen. We are again called upon by General Washington, for a reinforcement of the militia and have complied with his requisition, on our part
The grand committee consisting of Mr. Howell, Mr. Foster, Mr. King, Mr. Cook, Mr. Platt, Mr. Cadwallader, Mr. Henry, Mr. Bedford, Mr. M'Henry, Mr. Hardy, Mr. Williamson, Mr. Pinckney and Mr. Houstoun, appointed to report a requisition on the states for the supplies of the present year, beg leaveto [sic] lay before Congress, the following report.

The grand committee consisting of Mr. Howell, Mr. Foster, Mr. King, Mr...

Public domain scan of the book page, free to use, no copyright restrictions image - Picryl description

By the United States in Congress assembled. October 11, 1787 : The committee to whom was referred a report of the Board of Treasury and a motion of Mr. Kean, respecting the requisition for 1787, having reported ...

By the United States in Congress assembled. October 11, 1787 : The com...

Imprint supplied by Evans. Former attribution to the press of John Dunlap rejected in the Journals of the Continental Congress, v. 33, p. 753. Evans 20763 Journals of the Continental Congress, 596 LC copy signe... More

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisition of the government of Ohio, on charge of kidnapping Jerry Phinney, and tried before the Franklin Circuit Court of Kentucky, April 10, 1846.

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisiti...

Also available in digital form on the Library of Congress Web site.

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisition of the government of Ohio, on charge of kidnapping Jerry Phinney, and tried before the Franklin Circuit Court of Kentucky, April 10, 1846.

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisiti...

Also available in digital form on the Library of Congress Web site.

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisition of the government of Ohio, on charge of kidnapping Jerry Phinney, and tried before the Franklin Circuit Court of Kentucky, April 10, 1846.

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisiti...

Also available in digital form on the Library of Congress Web site.

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisition of the government of Ohio, on charge of kidnapping Jerry Phinney, and tried before the Franklin Circuit Court of Kentucky, April 10, 1846.

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisiti...

Also available in digital form on the Library of Congress Web site.

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisition of the government of Ohio, on charge of kidnapping Jerry Phinney, and tried before the Franklin Circuit Court of Kentucky, April 10, 1846.

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisiti...

Also available in digital form on the Library of Congress Web site.

Board of Treasury, June 22, 1786 : Sir, we do ourselves the honour of submitting, through Your Excellency, to the consideration of Congress, the report of this board on the requisition of the present year. ...

Board of Treasury, June 22, 1786 : Sir, we do ourselves the honour of ...

Title from opening lines of letter. Signed: Samuel Osgood, Walter Livingston, Arthur Lee. Imprint from Evans. Formerly ascribed to the press of John Dunlap in the Journals of the Continental Congress, v. 31, p.... More

The grand committee consisting of Mr. Howell, Mr. Foster, Mr. King, Mr. Cook, Mr. Platt, Mr. Cadwallader, Mr. Henry, Mr. Bedford, Mr. M'Henry, Mr. Hardy, Mr. Williamson, Mr. Pinckney and Mr. Houstoun, appointed to report a requisition on the states for the supplies of the present year, beg leaveto [sic] lay before Congress, the following report.

The grand committee consisting of Mr. Howell, Mr. Foster, Mr. King, Mr...

Public domain scan of the book page, free to use, no copyright restrictions image - Picryl description

By the United States in Congress assembled. October 11, 1787 : The committee to whom was referred a report of the Board of Treasury and a motion of Mr. Kean, respecting the requisition for 1787, having reported ...

By the United States in Congress assembled. October 11, 1787 : The com...

Imprint supplied by Evans. Former attribution to the press of John Dunlap rejected in the Journals of the Continental Congress, v. 33, p. 753. Evans 20763 Journals of the Continental Congress, 596 LC copy signe... More

By the United States in Congress assembled. October 11, 1787 : The committee to whom was referred a report of the Board of Treasury and a motion of Mr. Kean, respecting the requisition for 1787, having reported ...

By the United States in Congress assembled. October 11, 1787 : The com...

Imprint supplied by Evans. Former attribution to the press of John Dunlap rejected in the Journals of the Continental Congress, v. 33, p. 753. Evans 20763 Journals of the Continental Congress, 596 LC copy signe... More

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisition of the government of Ohio, on charge of kidnapping Jerry Phinney, and tried before the Franklin Circuit Court of Kentucky, April 10, 1846.

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisiti...

Also available in digital form on the Library of Congress Web site.

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisition of the government of Ohio, on charge of kidnapping Jerry Phinney, and tried before the Franklin Circuit Court of Kentucky, April 10, 1846.

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisiti...

Also available in digital form on the Library of Congress Web site.

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisition of the government of Ohio, on charge of kidnapping Jerry Phinney, and tried before the Franklin Circuit Court of Kentucky, April 10, 1846.

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisiti...

Also available in digital form on the Library of Congress Web site.

A statement of the national debt, with a requisition of Congress, on the United States. April 27, 1784. Richmond: Printed by Dunlap and Hayes. Printers to the Commonwealth. [1784].

A statement of the national debt, with a requisition of Congress, on t...

Evans 18844.; Imprint 3. Page Order: Multipage Available also through the Library of Congress web site in two forms: as facsimile page images and as full text in SGML. Printed Ephemera Collection; Portfolio 179... More

A statement of the national debt, with a requisition of Congress, on the United States. April 27, 1784. Richmond: Printed by Dunlap and Hayes. Printers to the Commonwealth. [1784].

A statement of the national debt, with a requisition of Congress, on t...

Evans 18844.; Imprint 3. Page Order: Multipage Available also through the Library of Congress web site in two forms: as facsimile page images and as full text in SGML. Printed Ephemera Collection; Portfolio 179... More

A statement of the national debt, with a requisition of Congress, on the United States. April 27, 1784. Richmond: Printed by Dunlap and Hayes. Printers to the Commonwealth. [1784].

A statement of the national debt, with a requisition of Congress, on t...

Evans 18844.; Imprint 3. Page Order: Multipage Available also through the Library of Congress web site in two forms: as facsimile page images and as full text in SGML. Printed Ephemera Collection; Portfolio 179... More

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisition of the government of Ohio, on charge of kidnapping Jerry Phinney, and tried before the Franklin Circuit Court of Kentucky, April 10, 1846.

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisiti...

Also available in digital form on the Library of Congress Web site.

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisition of the government of Ohio, on charge of kidnapping Jerry Phinney, and tried before the Franklin Circuit Court of Kentucky, April 10, 1846.

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisiti...

Also available in digital form on the Library of Congress Web site.

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisition of the government of Ohio, on charge of kidnapping Jerry Phinney, and tried before the Franklin Circuit Court of Kentucky, April 10, 1846.

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisiti...

Also available in digital form on the Library of Congress Web site.

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisition of the government of Ohio, on charge of kidnapping Jerry Phinney, and tried before the Franklin Circuit Court of Kentucky, April 10, 1846.

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisiti...

Also available in digital form on the Library of Congress Web site.

A statement of the national debt, with a requisition of Congress, on the United States. April 27, 1784. Richmond: Printed by Dunlap and Hayes. Printers to the Commonwealth. [1784].

A statement of the national debt, with a requisition of Congress, on t...

Evans 18844.; Imprint 3. Page Order: Multipage Available also through the Library of Congress web site in two forms: as facsimile page images and as full text in SGML. Printed Ephemera Collection; Portfolio 179... More

A statement of the national debt, with a requisition of Congress, on the United States. April 27, 1784. Richmond: Printed by Dunlap and Hayes. Printers to the Commonwealth. [1784].

A statement of the national debt, with a requisition of Congress, on t...

Evans 18844.; Imprint 3. Page Order: Multipage Available also through the Library of Congress web site in two forms: as facsimile page images and as full text in SGML. Printed Ephemera Collection; Portfolio 179... More

A statement of the national debt, with a requisition of Congress, on the United States. April 27, 1784. Richmond: Printed by Dunlap and Hayes. Printers to the Commonwealth. [1784].

A statement of the national debt, with a requisition of Congress, on t...

Evans 18844.; Imprint 3. Page Order: Multipage Available also through the Library of Congress web site in two forms: as facsimile page images and as full text in SGML. Printed Ephemera Collection; Portfolio 179... More

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisition of the government of Ohio, on charge of kidnapping Jerry Phinney, and tried before the Franklin Circuit Court of Kentucky, April 10, 1846.

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisiti...

Also available in digital form on the Library of Congress Web site.

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisition of the government of Ohio, on charge of kidnapping Jerry Phinney, and tried before the Franklin Circuit Court of Kentucky, April 10, 1846.

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisiti...

Also available in digital form on the Library of Congress Web site.

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisition of the government of Ohio, on charge of kidnapping Jerry Phinney, and tried before the Franklin Circuit Court of Kentucky, April 10, 1846.

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisiti...

Also available in digital form on the Library of Congress Web site.

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisition of the government of Ohio, on charge of kidnapping Jerry Phinney, and tried before the Franklin Circuit Court of Kentucky, April 10, 1846.

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisiti...

Also available in digital form on the Library of Congress Web site.

The grand committee consisting of Mr. Howell, Mr. Foster, Mr. King, Mr. Cook, Mr. Platt, Mr. Cadwallader, Mr. Henry, Mr. Bedford, Mr. M'Henry, Mr. Hardy, Mr. Williamson, Mr. Pinckney and Mr. Houstoun, appointed to report a requisition on the states for the supplies of the present year, beg leaveto [sic] lay before Congress, the following report.

The grand committee consisting of Mr. Howell, Mr. Foster, Mr. King, Mr...

Public domain scan of the book page, free to use, no copyright restrictions image - Picryl description

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisition of the government of Ohio, on charge of kidnapping Jerry Phinney, and tried before the Franklin Circuit Court of Kentucky, April 10, 1846.

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisiti...

Also available in digital form on the Library of Congress Web site.

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisition of the government of Ohio, on charge of kidnapping Jerry Phinney, and tried before the Franklin Circuit Court of Kentucky, April 10, 1846.

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisiti...

Also available in digital form on the Library of Congress Web site.

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisition of the government of Ohio, on charge of kidnapping Jerry Phinney, and tried before the Franklin Circuit Court of Kentucky, April 10, 1846.

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisiti...

Also available in digital form on the Library of Congress Web site.

At a General Assembly of the Governor and company of the State of Connecticut, holden at Hartford, on the second Thursday of May, 1780. Whereas a requisition has been made on this State by the Honorable Commitee of Congress, and by his excellenc

At a General Assembly of the Governor and company of the State of Conn...

Imprint 3. Available also through the Library of Congress web site in two forms: as facsimile page images and as full text in SGML. 2 duplicate copies Printed Ephemera Collection; Portfolio 3, Folder 53. Copy scanned: 2

A statement of the national debt, with a requisition of Congress, on the United States. April 27, 1784. Richmond: Printed by Dunlap and Hayes. Printers to the Commonwealth. [1784].

A statement of the national debt, with a requisition of Congress, on t...

Evans 18844.; Imprint 3. Page Order: Multipage Available also through the Library of Congress web site in two forms: as facsimile page images and as full text in SGML. Printed Ephemera Collection; Portfolio 179... More

(Circular.) Sir. I herewith enclose you a copy of the general orders which I have given in consequence of a requisition from the president of the United States ... Js. Barbour [Richmond, 1812?].

(Circular.) Sir. I herewith enclose you a copy of the general orders w...

Page Order: Leaflet Available also through the Library of Congress web site in two forms: as facsimile page images and as full text in SGML. Printed Ephemera Collection; Portfolio 183, Folder 13.

The grand committee consisting of Mr. Howell, Mr. Foster, Mr. King, Mr. Cook, Mr. Platt, Mr. Cadwallader, Mr. Henry, Mr. Bedford, Mr. M'Henry, Mr. Hardy, Mr. Williamson, Mr. Pinckney and Mr. Houstoun, appointed to report a requisition on the states for the supplies of the present year, beg leaveto [sic] lay before Congress, the following report.

The grand committee consisting of Mr. Howell, Mr. Foster, Mr. King, Mr...

Public domain scan of the book page, free to use, no copyright restrictions image - Picryl description

The grand committee consisting of Mr. Howell, Mr. Foster, Mr. King, Mr. Cook, Mr. Platt, Mr. Cadwallader, Mr. Henry, Mr. Bedford, Mr. M'Henry, Mr. Hardy, Mr. Williamson, Mr. Pinckney and Mr. Houstoun, appointed to report a requisition on the states for the supplies of the present year, beg leaveto [sic] lay before Congress, the following report.

The grand committee consisting of Mr. Howell, Mr. Foster, Mr. King, Mr...

Public domain scan of the book page, free to use, no copyright restrictions image - Picryl description

By the United States in Congress assembled. October 11, 1787 : The committee to whom was referred a report of the Board of Treasury and a motion of Mr. Kean, respecting the requisition for 1787, having reported ...

By the United States in Congress assembled. October 11, 1787 : The com...

Imprint supplied by Evans. Former attribution to the press of John Dunlap rejected in the Journals of the Continental Congress, v. 33, p. 753. Evans 20763 Journals of the Continental Congress, 596 LC copy signe... More

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisition of the government of Ohio, on charge of kidnapping Jerry Phinney, and tried before the Franklin Circuit Court of Kentucky, April 10, 1846.

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisiti...

Also available in digital form on the Library of Congress Web site.

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisition of the government of Ohio, on charge of kidnapping Jerry Phinney, and tried before the Franklin Circuit Court of Kentucky, April 10, 1846.

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisiti...

Also available in digital form on the Library of Congress Web site.

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisition of the government of Ohio, on charge of kidnapping Jerry Phinney, and tried before the Franklin Circuit Court of Kentucky, April 10, 1846.

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisiti...

Also available in digital form on the Library of Congress Web site.

A statement of the national debt, with a requisition of Congress, on the United States. April 27, 1784. Richmond: Printed by Dunlap and Hayes. Printers to the Commonwealth. [1784].

A statement of the national debt, with a requisition of Congress, on t...

Evans 18844.; Imprint 3. Page Order: Multipage Available also through the Library of Congress web site in two forms: as facsimile page images and as full text in SGML. Printed Ephemera Collection; Portfolio 179... More

A statement of the national debt, with a requisition of Congress, on the United States. April 27, 1784. Richmond: Printed by Dunlap and Hayes. Printers to the Commonwealth. [1784].

A statement of the national debt, with a requisition of Congress, on t...

Evans 18844.; Imprint 3. Page Order: Multipage Available also through the Library of Congress web site in two forms: as facsimile page images and as full text in SGML. Printed Ephemera Collection; Portfolio 179... More

A statement of the national debt, with a requisition of Congress, on the United States. April 27, 1784. Richmond: Printed by Dunlap and Hayes. Printers to the Commonwealth. [1784].

A statement of the national debt, with a requisition of Congress, on t...

Evans 18844.; Imprint 3. Page Order: Multipage Available also through the Library of Congress web site in two forms: as facsimile page images and as full text in SGML. Printed Ephemera Collection; Portfolio 179... More

A statement of the national debt, with a requisition of Congress, on the United States. April 27, 1784. Richmond: Printed by Dunlap and Hayes. Printers to the Commonwealth. [1784].

A statement of the national debt, with a requisition of Congress, on t...

Evans 18844.; Imprint 3. Page Order: Multipage Available also through the Library of Congress web site in two forms: as facsimile page images and as full text in SGML. Printed Ephemera Collection; Portfolio 179... More

The committee, consisting of [blank] to whom wasreferred [sic] the report of the Board of Treasury respecting a requisition for the year 1788, report ...

The committee, consisting of [blank] to whom wasreferred [sic] the rep...

Imprint from Evans. Former attribution to John Dunlap rejected in the Journals of the Continental Congress, v. 34, p. 631. Recorded in Dunlap's account book. Cf. JCC 610. Evans 21519 Journals of the Continental... More

By the United States in Congress assembled, Wednesday, August 20, 1788 : The committee, consisting of Mr. Clark, Mr. Dane, Mr. Williamson, Mr. Bingham, and Mr. Baldwin, to whom was referred the report of the Board of Treasury respecting a requisition for the year 1788, having reported ...

By the United States in Congress assembled, Wednesday, August 20, 1788...

Imprint from Evans. Former attribution to John Dunlap rejected in the Journals of the Continental Congress, v. 34, p. 631. Recorded in Dunlap's account book. Cf. JCC 611. Evans 21516 Journals of the Continental... More

By the United States in Congress assembled, Wednesday, August 20, 1788 : The committee, consisting of Mr. Clark, Mr. Dane, Mr. Williamson, Mr. Bingham, and Mr. Baldwin, to whom was referred the report of the Board of Treasury respecting a requisition for the year 1788, having reported ...

By the United States in Congress assembled, Wednesday, August 20, 1788...

Imprint from Evans. Former attribution to John Dunlap rejected in the Journals of the Continental Congress, v. 34, p. 631. Recorded in Dunlap's account book. Cf. JCC 611. Evans 21516 Journals of the Continental... More

Requisition for straw, cor Capt. company of Virginia militia, from the regiment, in the county of, called into actual service under the general orders of the day of 181. now at [181-].

Requisition for straw, cor Capt. company of Virginia militia, from the...

Public domain scan of the book page, free to use, no copyright restrictions image - Picryl description

General order. Philadelphia, 16th September 1814. To General Bloomfield, Commandant of the fourth military district, having on the 15th instant, made a requisition for an additional military force, I do therefore, order into the service of the u

General order. Philadelphia, 16th September 1814. To General Bloomfiel...

Page Order: Leaflet Available also through the Library of Congress web site in two forms: as facsimile page images and as full text in SGML. Printed Ephemera Collection; Portfolio 151, Folder 24c.

The grand committee consisting of Mr. Howell, Mr. Foster, Mr. King, Mr. Cook, Mr. Platt, Mr. Cadwallader, Mr. Henry, Mr. Bedford, Mr. M'Henry, Mr. Hardy, Mr. Williamson, Mr. Pinckney and Mr. Houstoun, appointed to report a requisition on the states for the supplies of the present year, beg leaveto [sic] lay before Congress, the following report.

The grand committee consisting of Mr. Howell, Mr. Foster, Mr. King, Mr...

Public domain scan of the book page, free to use, no copyright restrictions image - Picryl description

The grand committee consisting of Mr. Howell, Mr. Foster, Mr. King, Mr. Cook, Mr. Platt, Mr. Cadwallader, Mr. Henry, Mr. Bedford, Mr. M'Henry, Mr. Hardy, Mr. Williamson, Mr. Pinckney and Mr. Houstoun, appointed to report a requisition on the states for the supplies of the present year, beg leaveto [sic] lay before Congress, the following report.

The grand committee consisting of Mr. Howell, Mr. Foster, Mr. King, Mr...

Public domain scan of the book page, free to use, no copyright restrictions image - Picryl description

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisition of the government of Ohio, on charge of kidnapping Jerry Phinney, and tried before the Franklin Circuit Court of Kentucky, April 10, 1846.

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisiti...

Also available in digital form on the Library of Congress Web site.

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisition of the government of Ohio, on charge of kidnapping Jerry Phinney, and tried before the Franklin Circuit Court of Kentucky, April 10, 1846.

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisiti...

Also available in digital form on the Library of Congress Web site.

Board of Treasury, June 22, 1786 : Sir, we do ourselves the honour of submitting, through Your Excellency, to the consideration of Congress, the report of this board on the requisition of the present year. ...

Board of Treasury, June 22, 1786 : Sir, we do ourselves the honour of ...

Title from opening lines of letter. Signed: Samuel Osgood, Walter Livingston, Arthur Lee. Imprint from Evans. Formerly ascribed to the press of John Dunlap in the Journals of the Continental Congress, v. 31, p.... More

Board of Treasury, June 22, 1786 : Sir, we do ourselves the honour of submitting, through Your Excellency, to the consideration of Congress, the report of this board on the requisition of the present year. ...

Board of Treasury, June 22, 1786 : Sir, we do ourselves the honour of ...

Title from opening lines of letter. Signed: Samuel Osgood, Walter Livingston, Arthur Lee. Imprint from Evans. Formerly ascribed to the press of John Dunlap in the Journals of the Continental Congress, v. 31, p.... More

Thomas Jefferson, January 1, 1784, Requisition for State Payments of United States Public Debt

Thomas Jefferson, January 1, 1784, Requisition for State Payments of U...

Requisition for State Payments of United States Public Debt

General order. Philadelphia, 16th September 1814. To General Bloomfield, Commandant of the fourth military district, having on the 15th instant, made a requisition for an additional military force, I do therefore, order into the service of the u

General order. Philadelphia, 16th September 1814. To General Bloomfiel...

Page Order: Leaflet Available also through the Library of Congress web site in two forms: as facsimile page images and as full text in SGML. Printed Ephemera Collection; Portfolio 151, Folder 24c.

The grand committee consisting of Mr. Howell, Mr. Foster, Mr. King, Mr. Cook, Mr. Platt, Mr. Cadwallader, Mr. Henry, Mr. Bedford, Mr. M'Henry, Mr. Hardy, Mr. Williamson, Mr. Pinckney and Mr. Houstoun, appointed to report a requisition on the states for the supplies of the present year, beg leaveto [sic] lay before Congress, the following report.

The grand committee consisting of Mr. Howell, Mr. Foster, Mr. King, Mr...

Public domain scan of the book page, free to use, no copyright restrictions image - Picryl description

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisition of the government of Ohio, on charge of kidnapping Jerry Phinney, and tried before the Franklin Circuit Court of Kentucky, April 10, 1846.

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisiti...

Also available in digital form on the Library of Congress Web site.

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisition of the government of Ohio, on charge of kidnapping Jerry Phinney, and tried before the Franklin Circuit Court of Kentucky, April 10, 1846.

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisiti...

Also available in digital form on the Library of Congress Web site.

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisition of the government of Ohio, on charge of kidnapping Jerry Phinney, and tried before the Franklin Circuit Court of Kentucky, April 10, 1846.

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisiti...

Also available in digital form on the Library of Congress Web site.

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisition of the government of Ohio, on charge of kidnapping Jerry Phinney, and tried before the Franklin Circuit Court of Kentucky, April 10, 1846.

The state of Ohio vs. Forbes and Armitage, arrested upon the requisiti...

Also available in digital form on the Library of Congress Web site.

Board of Treasury, June 22, 1786 : Sir, we do ourselves the honour of submitting, through Your Excellency, to the consideration of Congress, the report of this board on the requisition of the present year. ...

Board of Treasury, June 22, 1786 : Sir, we do ourselves the honour of ...

Title from opening lines of letter. Signed: Samuel Osgood, Walter Livingston, Arthur Lee. Imprint from Evans. Formerly ascribed to the press of John Dunlap in the Journals of the Continental Congress, v. 31, p.... More

The committee, consisting of [blank] to whom wasreferred [sic] the report of the Board of Treasury respecting a requisition for the year 1788, report ...

The committee, consisting of [blank] to whom wasreferred [sic] the rep...

Imprint from Evans. Former attribution to John Dunlap rejected in the Journals of the Continental Congress, v. 34, p. 631. Recorded in Dunlap's account book. Cf. JCC 610. Evans 21519 Journals of the Continental... More